colinramsay|10 years ago|0 comments|parent|on: Ember's Glimmer Engine
You appear to have been downvoted; while I don't know whether your potential solution is right or wrong your downvoters should have been polite enough to explain their reasoning.
11,728 results (0.048 seconds)
http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2014/09/commentar...
I have to believe the US Government already knows that ebola is capable of this, they've been studying it for decades. If it can spread by aerosol, they're lying to prevent substantially more panic.
Downvoters should start by refuting the linked article - it's a pretty important article. The authors are guaranteed to know a lot more about ebola than anyone here.
> As before, downvoters should explain their reasoning.
All right. I'm downvoting you for (a) victim-blaming, because you're basically saying that anyone who participates in any online community should expect an organized campaign of social violence and have only themselves to blame for it, (b) because you seem to imply that staying anonymous is sufficient protection when there are trolls who specialize in uncovering identities, and (c) because you're pretending that not intentionally participating in a community makes you safe from that community. Right now, in Gamergate, we've got a bunch of dudes trying to manufacture a political movement based on hounding one woman out of her home because her ex says she cheated on him.
Basically, in your world, no one deserves to be safe unless they cut off all human ties and live like a hermit. And that's bullshit.
This would help curb abusive down-voting. Too many people downvote whimsically simply because they disagree.
You can put a button in your app that says "Tapping this will drain your bank account and give you cancer" but if it also enables functionality that the user wants, they will tap it.
But I occasionally see downvoted comments that seem totally legitimate. If someone feels negatively about a comment (for reasons other than it being nonsense or off-topic), the mature thing to do is to explain their disagreement with the comment.
I agree that asking "why the downvote" is rarely productive. But downvoters should explain their point of view in addition to (or instead of) downvoting.
edit: downvoters should reply instead
Edit: downvoters should ask a punk or metalhead what he thinks about certain bands that went mainstream.
That being said:
"Talking about your kid, when he's not here, and presenting him, or your relation to him, in such a way that you benefit from the exposition"
Is this abuse?
"For all it's worth, I love my kids. Of course. And I would throw myself under a bus for any of them. Of course. And I almost have, twice (under my motorbike, which is not a bus, but weights over 400 pounds)."
Because, in this context, you are using your child and your relation to them, as well as your love, as a way to bolster your own argument. It's a way to lend credibility and weight to what you have to say. It could be said that you felt your arguments couldn't stand on their own without making it clear that you're a parent.
=)
No, I dont' think it's abuse. I understand what I think you are trying to say: using those that would treat their children as mere accessories rather than children. But honestly, I don't think that's something you can see from one single post. Jeff made a post on a blog. It had some commentary, some interesting thoughts. It was something he had on his mind, and wanted to share it. He also used it as a segue into announcing the future birth of twins.
To equate his post on his personal site announcing the pregnancy to abuse is, if I may be so bold, absurd.
> downvoters should try to take care of my kids for a few days
And it could be equally said upvoters should take care of my kids for a few days.
Kids are different, and some can be an absolute joy, and others a nightmare. And you see both sides. People complaining, and people happy.
Throughout my life, I've heard people say "Just wait until..." and at that moment, I'll understand what they've said.
Sometimes this is the case. Sometimes it isn't.
Just wait until you're me. You'll understand.
Between 49 and 51 I count a difference of two percents?
> Turns out, we're having two babies, due in mid-February 2012.
Aha. Let's talk again in a year or two, see who you'd throw under a bus.
I have three of those myself. I don't really subscribe to this whole "kids are wonderful" cliché.
The first kid, it's wonderful, yes (but this has been said before, no?) The other kids? Let's say I would agree more with Louis CK:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcnXpOygKGI
Edit: downvoters should try to take care of my kids for a few days ;-)
EDIT: I know there is a rule against discussing downvotes, but this is a factual statement and the notion that this comment isn't relevant or doesn't enhance the conversation (for anyone who downvoted me) is an affront to any semblance of being capable of reasonable discourse in civil society - any downvoters should really reflect on what makes you feel like a statement made by a poster is actually what the poster thinks may or may not be right vs. your feelings of the post upsetting you.
Most people in Texas don't want this insane law either, but gerrymandering diminishes their voices.
edit: downvoters should explain why they are downvoting :)
And perhaps life really is easy. But as someone mentioned in the thread, spending $100-200k USD to renovate a property AND to basically change your career to a farmer is completely out of the question for 99.9% of the population.
At beast you would get some incredibly wealthy hobbyists who adore Japanese cultural heritage, but judging their success realistically, it doesn't look like there's many takers, so my point still stands.
Maybe the downvoters should put their money where their mouth is and go spend a few million on restoration of these properties.
Edit: Downvoters should be required to also take a molecular biology course.
downvoters should at least have the fortitude to respond why they disagree.
Whatever, I'm out. Life's too short.
Edit: downvoters should note this happens all the time, as in regulators getting high-level positions in their former ”client base”
I did not downvote you and I think you make an interesting point. I agree downvoters should explain.
Of course they "adored" him. That's how you act around a dictator, because you'll be tossed in the gulags if you don't--often, your family too.
It is not well known amongst programmer who would like to use parsers that most algorithms as implemented in countless software libraries are wrong and broken beyond repair. We should strive to make it a well-known fact and promote those parsers that work properly, so that less programmers and end-users need to suffer.
So these huge nuclear power plants may quickly become obsolete along with coal, solar and wind power generation, hydro and fossil fuels.
[2] https://newatlas.com/energy/nano-diamond-self-charging-batte...
[3] https://newatlas.com/energy/nano-diamond-battery-interview-n...
BTW I think HN downvoters should lose karma for downvoting.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism_in_Kerala
Edit: downvoters should instead explain to me why my point is wrong. Kerala has been ran by the local communist parties for most of the last 40 years, and communists keep winning majorities there. Seems to go against the OP claim
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_Democratic_Front_(Keral...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Kerala_Legislative_Asse...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Kerala_Legislative_Asse...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_Kerala_Legislative_Asse...
And so on, the communists and the other party trade power most elections.